This Isn't an Immigration Debate. It's a Corruption Debate.

Why "billionaires cutting the line" wins by 30 points.

February 25, 2026 | 3 min read

Lead with fairness, not policy.  "Billionaires buying their way to the front of the line" beats "let's study the EU precedent" by 30 points. The moral frame outperforms the technocratic frame every time.

We tested 29 messages on the Gold Card visa program. The winner (64.1%): "This lets billionaires buy their way to the front of the line while families who followed the rules wait for decades." The loser (33.9%): "Before we rush in, we should look at how golden visa programs worked in other countries."

That gap tells you what debate voters think they're having. The EU comparison treats this as immigration policy. The "cutting the line" frame treats it as corruption. Voters chose corruption.

The base program polls at -14. Add the Platinum tier's tax exemption for foreign millionaires, and it drops to -42. And here's the number that should worry the administration: Republicans split 46-44 on that tax exemption. The populist coalition has limits—and they're somewhere around "exempting oligarchs from paying taxes."

We saw a similar dynamic on AI regulation. 66% say developers should be liable for harms "even if the technology is unpredictable." 76% support mandatory labeling. 72% want affirmative consent for data scraping. Voters aren't debating whether to regulate—they're asking who's accountable when things go wrong.

Both issues—immigration shortcuts for the wealthy, AI liability—point to the same underlying demand: accountability from people in power. The specific policy matters less than the accountability question. "Who's responsible?" is always the right place to start.

WHAT THIS MEANS IN 10 SECONDS

• For campaigns: Don't explain why the policy is bad. Explain who benefits at your expense.

• For lawmakers: The tax exemption is the kill shot. Focus there.

• For advocates: Billionaires cutting the line" works across partisan lines. The fairness frame is universal.

Methodology: Message testing (n=1,100) and flash poll (n=750), February 17-18, 2026.

Want to test fairness vs. policy frames in your race? Talk to us →